Core Service Pillar

The Strategic
Integrity Audit.

We provide a clinical assessment of your evaluation frameworks. A comprehensive stress-test of your hiring pipeline designed to identify structural weaknesses in candidate validation.

The 6-Point Integrity Framework.

Modeled on rigorous professional verification standards, we evaluate platform resilience across six critical dimensions.

Authenticity

Can the candidate's output be distinguished from synthetic generation?

Identity

Is the person taking the test the same person who applied?

Environment

Is the candidate's digital workspace isolated or permeable?

Originality

Does the solution demonstrate unique cognitive reasoning or pattern-matching?

Latency

Does the speed of response align with human physiological limits?

Coherence

Does the verbal explanation match the code complexity?

The Verification Lifecycle

Our audit maps the primary stages of evaluation risk.

01

Environmental Audit

We map the digital footprint of existing evaluation frameworks to identify known limitations and structural gaps.

02

Process Stress-Test

We simulate diverse candidate behaviors and external inputs to evaluate the stability of the testing environment.

03

Capability Mapping

We assess the precision of the results against known benchmarks to ensure genuine skill is being captured.

Case Study Breakdown

Anatomy of a Failure: The "Speed Trap".

An analysis of why high-velocity cognitive aptitude tests (like those offered by Criteria Corp) have become a comprehensive liability in the age of AI.

The Vendor Promise

"50 Questions in 15 Minutes." The premise is that human cognitive processing speed is a reliable proxy for general intelligence (g-factor). The extreme time pressure (18 seconds per question) is designed to make googling impossible.

The Technical Reality

This model relies on the assumption that the test-taker is reading with human eyes. A multimodal agent (e.g., GPT-4o via API) can ingest a screen frame, process the logic puzzle, and return a solution in 400ms.

Performance Latency Distribution

Human Candidate vs. AI Agent (Criteria Corp Cognitive Aptitude Test)

Average Human67th Percentile
Avg Time: 14s / questionAccuracy: 72%
AI-Augmented Candidate99th Percentile
Avg Time: 0.8s / questionAccuracy: 98.5%

The Consequence: Adverse Selection

Because the AI is exponentially faster and more accurate, **you are now statistically more likely to interview a cheater than an honest genius.** The test has become a filter that removes integrity from your pool.

Authentic Personnel Only.

Get the unvarnished truth about your platform's resilience. Our audit is discreet, rigorous, and conclusive.